Evaluation OF THE INFORMATIVE SPEECH №9
  Hello! Last week we
watched the zoom performance of our group mate, Marina. Now I would like to
evaluate it.
1. Introduction:
( 10 points)
·        What technique(s) was used in the introduction?
    She used making a reference to the audience as an
attention-getter.
·        Any link-element?
·         The link-element was that if a person can’t
deliver his/her speech effectively, it may lose its interest or even importance
for the audience.
·        Was the thesis statement given?
·        The main thesis statement was that vocal delivery plays
a great role in speech.
·        How effective was the introduction?
·        It  was effective because Marina was
persuasive.
| 
Very effective 
10, 9, 8 | 
Average 
7, 6, 5 | 
Not effective 
4, 3, 2, 1 | 
Max 10 pts 
____10_____ | 
2.
Body:  (10 points)
·        How well structured was the information presented?
·        I reckon that the speech was well-structured. 
| 
Highly organized 
10, 9, 8 | 
Some organized 
7, 6, 5, 4 | 
None 
3, 2, 1 | 
·        What organizational structure was used in the body of
the speech?
·     Marina used problem-solution pattern of organization.
·        How understandable was the information (was it clearly
explained)?
·        All the information was clear.
| 
Very good 
10, 9, 8 | 
Had some
  problems 
7, 6, 5, 4 | 
Had major
  problems 
3, 2, 1 | 
·        Quality of point-support (appropriateness,
completeness, variety)
·        In my opinion, the point-support that Marina provided
was appropriate, complete, various.
| 
Lots of 
10, 9, 8 | 
Some 
     7, 6, 5, 4 | 
Almost no 
3, 2, 1 | 
·        Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories.
·        She used some examples.
| 
Lots of 
10, 9, 8 | 
Some 
7, 6, 5 | 
None 
4, 3, 2, 1 | 
·        Was it coherent?
·        The speech was coherent. 
| 
10  9  8  7 
  6  5  4  3  2  1 | 
| 
Max 10 pts 
____9_____ | 
3. Conclusion: (10
points)
·        What technique(s) was used in the conclusion?
·        I think she used a proverb as a technique.
·        Were all the steps followed (summary, action,
emotional appeal?)
·        Yes, all the steps were followed.
·        How effective was the conclusion?
| 
Very effective 
10, 9, 8 | 
Average 
7, 6, 5 | 
Not effective 
4, 3, 2, 1 | 
Max 10 pts 
_____9___ | |
| 
Total points:  30 | 
Given points: 28 | |||
The strength of the speech:  good structure, an unusual attention-getter, coherence, good examples
The weakness of the speech:  I think the speech did not have weaknesses. 
All in all, I
appreciated Marina’s work! She did a great job and her speech was really
interesting.
What do you think about it? Leave some comments down
below!
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий